To design a mechanism which can replace the traditional hammering mechanism to crush the stones, and to improve the efficiency of worker and reduce effort while hammering the stones.

Makers
Updates
15 Insights
References
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

1. youtube.com/watch?v=gD6d4hyLNNs 2. MachineDesignbyRobertL.Norton 3. efunda.com/materials/alloys/alloy_home/steels_properties.cfm

Suggestions and critics 4
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Integration with Hu‐motor and incorporating feeding mechanism.

Suggestions and critics 3
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Attachment of Cam to shaft could have been done through a key rather
than welding.

Suggestions and critics 2
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Manufacturing could have been done in better way.

Suggestions and critics 1
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Multiple use of product with modification in design by replacing hammer with axe for wood cutting.

Scope of improvement 3
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Feeding Mechanism: Implementing the feeding mechanism (As shown in CAD model)

Scope of improvement 2
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Productivity: Productivity can be increased by increasing the size of product so that it can accommodate more number of cams and hammer heads to increase the number of stones crushing ...

read more
Scope of Improvement 1
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Design of Cam: Improved design of cam to make the forces involved in lifting the hammer head constant

Parts and materials
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Cam - Ductile cast iron
Links - Hot rolled plain carbon steel
Support shafts - Ductile cast iron
Hammer head - Medium carbon steel
Cam support and Link support - Ductile cast iron

Constraint on design 6
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

If cam base radius is too small, pressure angle will be high, which causes more stress at cam bearing contact. If it is too large we will need a lot ...

read more
Constraint on design 5
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

If length of second link (one which is in contact with cam) is more, we will need larger cam and if it is too small larger forces will be generated ...

read more
Constraint on design 4
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

Rotation angle at pivot is also very important. If it is too large, cam size will increase dramatically and there will be a lot of torque variations while

rotating cam ...

read more
Constraint on design 3
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

If we change the pivot position, all the assembly will get affected. Hammer may not rise to the complete height required or it may rise more than required, some components ...

read more
Constraint on design 2
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

If we increase the length of the link 1, we don’t need to turn it too much about pivot to raise it to the same height, but at the ...

read more
Constraint on Design 1
posted 1 year, 10 months ago by Alex JV

If mass of the hammer is increased, then we don’t need to lift it to the same height to create same impulse, so we can have smaller link lengths ...

read more
0 Files
0 Documentations